<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>U.S. Law Watch &#187; Patentability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uslawwatch.com/tag/patentability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uslawwatch.com</link>
	<description>U.S. Legal &#38; Regulatory Headlines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:07:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>BNA INSIGHTS: Genetic Sequences: Patentable or Not?</title>
		<link>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2010/06/25/intellectual-property/bna-insights-genetic-sequences-patentable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2010/06/25/intellectual-property/bna-insights-genetic-sequences-patentable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patentability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawwatch.com/?p=2410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 29, Judge Robert Sweet of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued his opinion in Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent and...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.uslawwatch.com%2F2010%2F06%2F25%2Fintellectual-property%2Fbna-insights-genetic-sequences-patentable%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.uslawwatch.com%2F2010%2F06%2F25%2Fintellectual-property%2Fbna-insights-genetic-sequences-patentable%2F&amp;style=compact&amp;space=2&amp;hashtags=Biotechnology,Patentability,Patents&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div>On March 29, Judge Robert Sweet of the U.S. District  Court for the Southern District of New York issued his opinion in Association for Molecular  Pathology v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, No. 09 Civ. 4515,  94 USPQ2d 1683 (S.D.N.Y. March 29, 2010 (as amended on April 2 and 5,  2010)) (79 PTCJ 661, 4/2/10) (“Myriad”).  The plaintiffs in the matter  were various nonprofit advocacy organizations, research and scientific  institutions, and a number of individuals who suffered from, or were at  risk for, breast or ovarian cancers.</div>
<p> The plaintiffs challenged the validity of numerous  patents (5,747,282; 5,837,492; 5,693,473; 5,709,999; 5,170,001,  5,753,441; and 6,033,857) owned by defendants Myriad Genetics and the University of  Utah Research Foundation.  The patents at issue claimed certain methods  and processes based on&#8230;</p>
<p><span title="Patent Trademark &amp; Copyright Journal Trial Request" class="mce_plugin_cforms_img">Patent Trademark &amp; Copyright Journal Trial Request</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2010/06/25/intellectual-property/bna-insights-genetic-sequences-patentable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 13/21 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 0/0 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.uslawwatch.com @ 2012-02-08 10:39:19 -->
